Triple

T25466997
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Classical Aramaic E638201 entity
Predicate standardizedFormOf P158574 FINISHED
Object Aramaic LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Aramaic | Statement: [Classical Aramaic, standardizedFormOf, Aramaic]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: standardizedFormOf
Context triple: [Classical Aramaic, standardizedFormOf, Aramaic]
  • A. standardizedFor
    Indicates that something has been adjusted or converted to conform to a common standard, format, or reference so it can be consistently compared or used.
  • B. standardFormUsedIn
    Indicates that a particular standard form is employed or applied within a given context, process, or system.
  • C. standardFormulation
    Indicates that something is expressed or represented in a conventional, officially accepted, or commonly used form or version.
  • D. standardizedIn
    Indicates that something has been formally defined, regulated, or made uniform within a particular standard, framework, or jurisdiction.
  • E. formalizedUnder
    Indicates that something has been officially established, defined, or codified within the framework, authority, or provisions of a particular formal system, agreement, or institution.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75db8bab08190baca80b4a8c315fd completed April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f5f74e449c8190afaa3c05496ed598 completed May 2, 2026, 1:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f468421ba08190880eac99135e5970 completed May 1, 2026, 8:45 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f46d361c348190b5fdfd805ecde01b completed May 1, 2026, 9:07 a.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 2:15 p.m.