Triple
T25433543
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kayles |
E637318
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNoChanceMoves |
P179770
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Kayles, hasNoChanceMoves, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNoChanceMoves Context triple: [Kayles, hasNoChanceMoves, true]
-
A.
hasFinishingMove
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a specific, often decisive or signature, final action or move used to conclude an encounter or event.
-
B.
canBeWonWithout
Indicates that a goal, contest, or outcome can be successfully achieved without the involvement, use, or occurrence of a specified entity or condition.
-
C.
hasNoTakeArea
Indicates that an entity is associated with an area where taking or extracting resources is not allowed.
-
D.
hasOptimalPlayProperty
Indicates that the subject possesses a characteristic or condition under which its behavior, strategy, or outcome is considered optimally effective according to defined criteria.
-
E.
hasPotential
Indicates that an entity possesses the capacity or possibility to develop, achieve, or exhibit a particular state, quality, or outcome in the future.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75db6c97081908178383fa632b193 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f727afd5d88190ad48735cd1b32787 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72737c42c8190a3f781a5e98868ff |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:45 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f727ad9ff88190ba8069dd48b2e98f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:59 p.m.