Triple
T25433542
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Kayles |
E637318
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPerfectInformation |
P82529
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Kayles, hasPerfectInformation, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPerfectInformation Context triple: [Kayles, hasPerfectInformation, true]
-
A.
isPerfectInformationGame
chosen
Indicates that the game is one of perfect information, where all players have complete knowledge of all past actions and relevant game states at every decision point.
-
B.
isInformationComplete
Indicates that the available information about an entity or situation is sufficient, comprehensive, and lacks no required or relevant details.
-
C.
canBeWonWithout
Indicates that a goal, contest, or outcome can be successfully achieved without the involvement, use, or occurrence of a specified entity or condition.
-
D.
isTotallyPerfect
Indicates that an entity possesses complete flawlessness or ideal qualities in every relevant aspect.
-
E.
secretlyInformed
Indicates that one entity provided information to another in a concealed or confidential manner, without the knowledge of others.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75db6c97081908178383fa632b193 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6430a93a48190854ce71df680b2fa |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:31 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641da05b881909f6283c988639c53 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:59 p.m.