Triple
T25433494
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Domineering |
E637317
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChanceElements |
P76195
|
FINISHED |
| Object | none |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: none | Statement: [Domineering, hasChanceElements, none]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChanceElements Context triple: [Domineering, hasChanceElements, none]
-
A.
chanceElement
chosen
Indicates that the relationship or outcome involves randomness or probabilistic chance rather than being deterministic.
-
B.
hasPotential
Indicates that an entity possesses the capacity or possibility to develop, achieve, or exhibit a particular state, quality, or outcome in the future.
-
C.
hasFailureProbability
Indicates that an entity is associated with a likelihood or chance that it will fail within a given context or conditions.
-
D.
hasSurvivalElements
Indicates that something includes features or conditions related to survival, such as resource management, threat avoidance, or sustaining life over time.
-
E.
hasAlternativeElements
Indicates that one entity includes or is associated with elements that can serve as substitutes or options in place of other elements.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75db6c97081908178383fa632b193 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63fd6c68481908c542aa03e297b9c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63c6456608190b94e7c2e2c2a4824 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:59 p.m.