Triple
T25388899
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Magnes |
E631602
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethnicNameDerivedFrom |
P138138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Magnetes |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Magnetes | Statement: [Magnes, ethnicNameDerivedFrom, Magnetes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethnicNameDerivedFrom Context triple: [Magnes, ethnicNameDerivedFrom, Magnetes]
-
A.
hasNameEtymologyIn
Indicates that the origin or derivation of an entity’s name is based in, or traceable to, a specified source such as a language, place, or cultural context.
-
B.
ethnonymRoot
chosen
Indicates that one term serves as the morphological or etymological root from which an ethnonym (a name for an ethnic group or people) is derived.
-
C.
nameEtymologyFor
Indicates that one entity expresses or explains the origin or derivation of the name of another entity.
-
D.
familyNameDerivedFrom
Indicates that one entity’s family name originates from, or is etymologically derived from, another entity.
-
E.
possibleNameEtymology
Indicates a hypothesized or suggested origin or derivation of an entity’s name from another term, source, or linguistic root.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a8c50788190aabaa9f96710fc43 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f60c3b09488190ade1b69ff7f0df0e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f60b8461ac81908c5bd3d73eed59f4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 2:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:47 p.m.