Triple

T25371900
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject NFA E632951 entity
Predicate formalLanguageClass P10465 FINISHED
Object regular language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: regular language | Statement: [NFA, formalLanguageClass, regular language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formalLanguageClass
Context triple: [NFA, formalLanguageClass, regular language]
  • A. inLanguageTheory
    Indicates that something is analyzed, described, or formulated within a particular linguistic or formal language theory.
  • B. linguisticClassification chosen
    Indicates the relationship by which an entity is categorized according to its language or linguistic type.
  • C. 公式言語
    Indicates that something is expressed or represented using a formal language, typically defined by precise syntax and semantics.
  • D. linguisticClassificationBasis
    Indicates the criterion or principle used as the basis for classifying something within a linguistic system or framework.
  • E. formalismFeature
    Indicates that something is a characteristic, component, or property that belongs to or defines a particular formal system or formalism.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75a90c0dc819092f928b6ea0ecc72 completed April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6135293908190809e255bf6334760 completed May 2, 2026, 3:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f611a72780819082f44e66ca2c6ac9 completed May 2, 2026, 3 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:38 p.m.