Triple

T25366812
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Arrondissement of Cayenne E632821 entity
Predicate hasINSEECodePrefix P27964 FINISHED
Object 973 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 973 | Statement: [Arrondissement of Cayenne, hasINSEECodePrefix, 973]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasINSEECodePrefix
Context triple: [Arrondissement of Cayenne, hasINSEECodePrefix, 973]
  • A. inseeCode chosen
    Indicates the official INSEE (French national statistics institute) code assigned to an entity, typically identifying a specific geographic or administrative unit.
  • B. formerINSEECode
    Indicates that an entity was previously identified by a different INSEE code before being assigned its current one.
  • C. hasPostalCodePrefix
    Indicates that a location’s postal code begins with a specified sequence of characters.
  • D. hasFrenchINSEEClassification
    Indicates that an entity is assigned a specific classification code according to the French INSEE (national statistics and economic studies) system.
  • E. hasCommune
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, belongs to, or is located within a specific commune (municipal administrative unit).
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75a90c0dc819092f928b6ea0ecc72 completed April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f69383222c81909d8baa04129d5c81 completed May 3, 2026, 12:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f690eb1e948190aab41a89969519a5 completed May 3, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:37 p.m.