Triple
T25331986
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Singur |
E635173
|
entity |
| Predicate | courtCaseOutcome |
P99073
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supreme Court of India quashed land acquisition |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supreme Court of India quashed land acquisition | Statement: [Singur, courtCaseOutcome, Supreme Court of India quashed land acquisition]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: courtCaseOutcome Context triple: [Singur, courtCaseOutcome, Supreme Court of India quashed land acquisition]
-
A.
legalOutcome
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
legalCaseHeParticipatedInDecidedBy
Indicates that a legal case in which he participated was decided or adjudicated by a specified authority or court.
-
C.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
D.
legalCasePresided
Indicates that a particular legal case was overseen and directed by a specific judge or judicial authority.
-
E.
decisionCourt
chosen
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a9908108190a95427a97020632a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f497c72ffc81908aa380376bb068d3 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f4806d93dc8190b9dff4c63186faff |
completed | May 1, 2026, 10:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:30 p.m.