Triple
T25322692
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Banjul Charter |
E634927
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | African human rights treaty |
C743
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: African human rights treaty Context triple: [Banjul Charter, instanceOf, African human rights treaty]
-
A.
treaty body under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights
A treaty body under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights is an institutional mechanism established by the Charter to monitor, interpret, and promote compliance with the human and peoples’ rights obligations of its State Parties.
-
B.
African Union legal instrument
An African Union legal instrument is a formal, binding or non-binding document adopted by AU organs that establishes norms, rights, obligations, or procedures applicable to member states and AU institutions within the Union’s legal framework.
-
C.
international human rights instrument
chosen
An international human rights instrument is a formal, legally or politically binding document adopted by states or international organizations that defines, codifies, and promotes the protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms across national borders.
-
D.
Organ of the African Union
An Organ of the African Union is a principal institutional body established by the AU Constitutive Act to perform specific political, administrative, judicial, or advisory functions in advancing the Union’s objectives and policies.
-
E.
United Nations human rights review mechanism
A United Nations human rights review mechanism is a formal, periodic process through which UN bodies assess and monitor states’ compliance with international human rights obligations, typically involving state reports, independent expert or peer review, and public recommendations for improvement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a9908108190a95427a97020632a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:29 p.m.