Triple

T25307871
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hot Spot E634529 entity
Predicate hasResponsibleGamblingInformation P180687 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Hot Spot, hasResponsibleGamblingInformation, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasResponsibleGamblingInformation
Context triple: [Hot Spot, hasResponsibleGamblingInformation, yes]
  • A. hasResponsibleGamingMessage chosen
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a message promoting responsible or safe participation in gaming or gambling activities.
  • B. hasResponsibleGamblingProgram
    Indicates that an entity has implemented and maintains a program or measures aimed at promoting responsible gambling practices.
  • C. hasResponsibleGamblingPartnership
    Indicates that an entity maintains a formal partnership or collaboration focused on promoting or supporting responsible gambling practices.
  • D. wageringAvailable
    Indicates that it is possible to place bets or wagers on the associated event or entity.
  • E. hasCasino
    Indicates that an entity includes, contains, or is associated with a casino facility or gambling establishment.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75a972c6481909bc11710e8d30a6c completed April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7516d5b4081908588a6feb541f355 completed May 3, 2026, 1:45 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f74d40ebb081909daf60623e38f41d completed May 3, 2026, 1:27 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:25 p.m.