Triple
T25304572
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bob Packwood |
E634445
|
entity |
| Predicate | ethicsSanction |
P137150
|
FINISHED |
| Object | recommended expulsion by Senate Ethics Committee |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: recommended expulsion by Senate Ethics Committee | Statement: [Bob Packwood, ethicsSanction, recommended expulsion by Senate Ethics Committee]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethicsSanction Context triple: [Bob Packwood, ethicsSanction, recommended expulsion by Senate Ethics Committee]
-
A.
ethicsActions
Indicates that an entity performs, promotes, or is involved in actions guided by ethical principles or moral standards.
-
B.
hasEthicalConstraint
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specified ethical rule, limitation, or normative requirement that governs its behavior or decisions.
-
C.
ethicsAssessment
chosen
Indicates that an entity has been evaluated or judged according to ethical principles, standards, or guidelines.
-
D.
typeOfEthics
Indicates a relationship where one concept specifies the particular kind or category of ethics that another concept belongs to or is governed by.
-
E.
ethicsComplaint
Indicates that a formal allegation has been made claiming someone violated ethical rules or standards.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a972c6481909bc11710e8d30a6c |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f49399bf3881908b36a2b009be4f87 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:50 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f45d06d0388190b36ecde92013624a |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:25 p.m.