Triple
T25295064
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Isobel Harrison |
E634193
|
entity |
| Predicate | spouse fullName |
P109531
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gustav Theodore Holst |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gustav Theodore Holst | Statement: [Isobel Harrison, spouse fullName, Gustav Theodore Holst]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: spouse fullName Context triple: [Isobel Harrison, spouse fullName, Gustav Theodore Holst]
-
A.
spouse name
Indicates that one entity is the legally recognized husband or wife of the other, specifying the partner’s name in a marital relationship.
-
B.
spousePersonalName
chosen
Indicates the personal name of a person’s spouse in the relationship.
-
C.
spouseRealName
Indicates that one person is the legally recognized spouse of another, using the spouse’s real (non-alias) name.
-
D.
spouseFamilyName
Indicates that the object is the family name (surname) shared by or associated with a person's spouse.
-
E.
spouseAlsoKnownAs
Indicates that a person’s spouse is referred to by an alternative name or alias.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a9503d48190b80a005c6af0cb50 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f61f12b0f08190bc4a16907941864c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f61b37a5648190b10d33ae205ccfee |
completed | May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:22 p.m.