Triple

T25290257
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Warringah E634061 entity
Predicate electorateNumberOfElectorsApprox P16492 FINISHED
Object over 100000 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: over 100000 | Statement: [Warringah, electorateNumberOfElectorsApprox, over 100000]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: electorateNumberOfElectorsApprox
Context triple: [Warringah, electorateNumberOfElectorsApprox, over 100000]
  • A. numberOfElectors chosen
    Indicates the total count of electors associated with a given entity or context.
  • B. presidentialElectorAllocation
    Indicates how presidential electors are distributed or assigned among different jurisdictions or candidates in an election.
  • C. seatOfElector
    Indicates the location or jurisdiction that serves as the official base or constituency of a given elector.
  • D. hasElectoralVotes
    Indicates that a political entity (such as a state or district) possesses a specified number of votes in an electoral system used to choose an officeholder.
  • E. electoralVoteFor
    Indicates that a specified number of electoral votes are allocated or cast in favor of a particular candidate or option in an election.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75a9503d48190b80a005c6af0cb50 completed April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65aa07c048190a5df30d53d8f0cf5 completed May 2, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659cc571c819097e51e531961d812 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:21 p.m.