Triple
T25274125
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | TS Galaxy F.C. |
E633648
|
entity |
| Predicate | acquiredStatusOf |
P158082
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Highlands Park F.C. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Highlands Park F.C. | Statement: [TS Galaxy F.C., acquiredStatusOf, Highlands Park F.C.]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: acquiredStatusOf Context triple: [TS Galaxy F.C., acquiredStatusOf, Highlands Park F.C.]
-
A.
acquisitionStatus
Indicates the current state or outcome of an acquisition process between entities (e.g., pending, completed, failed, or canceled).
-
B.
statusAcquiredBy
Indicates that a particular status or condition has been obtained or gained by a specific entity.
-
C.
obtainedStatus
Indicates that an entity has received or achieved a particular status or condition as a result of some process or event.
-
D.
acquiredFor
Indicates that one entity obtained or purchased another entity specifically for the benefit, use, or purpose of a third entity.
-
E.
acquiredWith
Indicates that one entity was obtained, purchased, or gained together with or by means of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a92f48881909974ff9c11150a2e |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f48ba5024c8190acce739b3b97bdb8 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f44d849e7c81909945438f40e35362 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f45300bd488190bb1d4160f5534ef6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:17 p.m.