Triple

T25255254
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mother Jefferson E633152 entity
Predicate relationshipToLouiseJefferson P181196 FINISHED
Object mother-in-law LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mother-in-law | Statement: [Mother Jefferson, relationshipToLouiseJefferson, mother-in-law]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToLouiseJefferson
Context triple: [Mother Jefferson, relationshipToLouiseJefferson, mother-in-law]
  • A. relationshipToLouisXVI
    Indicates the specific familial, marital, or social relationship that an entity has to Louis XVI.
  • B. relationshipToLouisHinds
    Indicates the specific familial, social, or professional relationship that an entity has to Louis Hinds.
  • C. relationshipToDésirée
    Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship that one entity has to Désirée.
  • D. relationshipToJeanValjean
    Indicates the specific interpersonal or social connection that an entity has to Jean Valjean.
  • E. relationshipToMissWatson
    Indicates the type or nature of a person's relational connection to Miss Watson (e.g., familial, social, or other defined relationship).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75a922ad481908f4f1f884583cb42 completed April 21, 2026, 11:08 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7675b12848190a3569cfda29c5b0e completed May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f762f4b59481909f70074f11825bfb completed May 3, 2026, 3 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f76759b3c48190ad8f1b33596f98c4 completed May 3, 2026, 3:18 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:13 p.m.