Triple
T25238095
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Callaghan government |
E632390
|
entity |
| Predicate | lostParliamentaryMajority |
P158309
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1977 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1977 | Statement: [Callaghan government, lostParliamentaryMajority, 1977]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lostParliamentaryMajority Context triple: [Callaghan government, lostParliamentaryMajority, 1977]
-
A.
parliamentaryMajority
Indicates that a political party or coalition holds more than half the seats in a parliament, enabling it to control legislative decisions.
-
B.
heldParliamentaryMajorityFrom
Indicates that one party or group possessed more than half the seats in a parliamentary body during a specified time period.
-
C.
lostFederalMajority
Indicates that a political party or coalition no longer holds a majority of seats at the federal level.
-
D.
parliamentaryMajorityType
Indicates the type or nature of the majority held in a parliamentary body (e.g., absolute, simple, qualified) in relation to a given context or decision.
-
E.
heldParliamentaryMajorityUntil
Indicates that an entity maintained a controlling majority of seats in a parliamentary body up to a specified point in time.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a8ec5f88190b9eba06ae42b413a |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f47dfc523c8190b61295b451d1e5cd |
completed | May 1, 2026, 10:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f45d06d0388190b36ecde92013624a |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:57 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f465699c9c8190ac7b4b32b782550c |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:33 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 1:07 p.m.