Triple

T25217421
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fokker Scourge E631865 entity
Predicate hasInventorOfKeyTechnology P632 FINISHED
Object Anthony Fokker NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Anthony Fokker | Statement: [Fokker Scourge, hasInventorOfKeyTechnology, Anthony Fokker]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasInventorOfKeyTechnology
Context triple: [Fokker Scourge, hasInventorOfKeyTechnology, Anthony Fokker]
  • A. hasInventorRoleOf
    Indicates that an entity holds or fulfills the role of inventor with respect to another entity (such as an invention, patent, or creative work).
  • B. usedInventionOf
    Indicates that one entity made use of, applied, or implemented the invention created by another entity.
  • C. hasInventionProperty
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific characteristic, attribute, or quality related to an invention.
  • D. introducedTechnologyTo
    Indicates that one entity was responsible for presenting, bringing, or implementing a particular technology to another entity or context for the first time.
  • E. wasInventedBy chosen
    Indicates that something (typically an object, concept, or process) was created or brought into existence by a particular inventor or originator.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75a8d1aa48190a4320acd3654762c completed April 21, 2026, 11:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67c9fe7b48190b79b4041357edb49 completed May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f678cc272081909e5c70f1bc7407f0 completed May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 12:59 p.m.