Triple

T25217094
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hudson Mk II E631858 entity
Predicate hasImprovementType P5357 FINISHED
Object performance improvement LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: performance improvement | Statement: [Hudson Mk II, hasImprovementType, performance improvement]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasImprovementType
Context triple: [Hudson Mk II, hasImprovementType, performance improvement]
  • A. hasImproved
    Indicates that an entity’s state, quality, or performance has become better compared to a previous point in time.
  • B. improvesOn
    Indicates that one entity enhances, refines, or performs better than another entity, typically by addressing its limitations or increasing its effectiveness.
  • C. hasUpgrade chosen
    Indicates that one entity possesses, includes, or is associated with an improved or enhanced version of another entity.
  • D. hasImprovementProgram
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, participates in, or is covered by a program specifically designed to improve its performance, condition, or quality.
  • E. hasLightingImprovements
    Indicates that an entity has enhancements or upgrades made to its lighting conditions or systems.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e75a8d1aa48190a4320acd3654762c completed April 21, 2026, 11:07 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f5f6baf2d48190a6a4cd6501be87d2 completed May 2, 2026, 1:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f5afd5baac8190bb8ed576813c8591 completed May 2, 2026, 8:03 a.m.
Created at: April 21, 2026, 12:59 p.m.