Triple
T25200616
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miracle |
E631115
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStyleComparison |
P139014
|
FINISHED |
| Object | darker than much of Chvrches’ earlier output |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: darker than much of Chvrches’ earlier output | Statement: [Miracle, hasStyleComparison, darker than much of Chvrches’ earlier output]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStyleComparison Context triple: [Miracle, hasStyleComparison, darker than much of Chvrches’ earlier output]
-
A.
hasStyle
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular style or manner.
-
B.
hasComparison
chosen
Indicates that one entity is being evaluated or contrasted relative to another entity based on some shared attribute or criterion.
-
C.
hasHigherStyleThan
Indicates that one entity’s style is considered superior or more fashionable than another’s.
-
D.
hasMatureStyleComparedTo
Indicates that one entity exhibits a more developed, refined, or advanced style in comparison to another entity.
-
E.
hasStructuralStyle
Indicates that one entity possesses, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular architectural or structural design style.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a8b86c4819089eda22c843b739f |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6640168948190811bd5f933a87cf5 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:52 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6633451948190bcc0410602bb4914 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 12:51 p.m.