Triple
T25194496
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Invincible |
E630964
|
entity |
| Predicate | artContributor |
P151927
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ryan Ottley |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ryan Ottley | Statement: [Invincible, artContributor, Ryan Ottley]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: artContributor Context triple: [Invincible, artContributor, Ryan Ottley]
-
A.
creativeArtist
Indicates that one entity is an artist who creates or originates the work, performance, or creative output associated with another entity.
-
B.
artworkBy
Indicates that one entity is the creator or artist responsible for producing the other entity as an artwork.
-
C.
creativeContributor
chosen
Indicates a relationship where an entity plays an active role in originating, designing, or shaping the creative content or form of another entity.
-
D.
artistOfPublicArt
Indicates that one entity is the artist or creator responsible for a particular piece of public art.
-
E.
composerOfDepictingWork
Indicates that an entity is the composer of a musical work that is itself a depiction or representation of another entity or subject.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a8a6d088190ba1e82a4345225e7 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f46e1206f88190bfacdc420027c354 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 9:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f45cfb53f4819099bba48c5057e787 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 12:46 p.m.