Triple
T25183139
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | On the Beach |
E630638
|
entity |
| Predicate | impliesTheme |
P159080
|
FINISHED |
| Object | boundary between worlds |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: boundary between worlds | Statement: [On the Beach, impliesTheme, boundary between worlds]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: impliesTheme Context triple: [On the Beach, impliesTheme, boundary between worlds]
-
A.
usesThemeBy
Indicates that one entity incorporates, applies, or is based on a theme that was created, defined, or provided by another entity.
-
B.
themeFor
Indicates that something serves as the central subject, topic, or focus for another thing (such as an event, work, or activity).
-
C.
usesThemeFrom
Indicates that one work incorporates, references, or is based on the thematic material of another work.
-
D.
reflectsOnTheme
Indicates that one entity critically considers, analyzes, or comments on the theme expressed or embodied by another entity.
-
E.
transformationTheme
Indicates a thematic relationship in which one entity centers on or explores the process, experience, or idea of transformation in another.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e75a88fdf081908e47ae6e195c14e1 |
completed | April 21, 2026, 11:07 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f497bc12b881908fe3386c66252bf6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f49366e8d08190adb4b71fe3a14683 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 11:49 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f497b8abb88190bb672cf6907c4b8d |
completed | May 1, 2026, 12:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 21, 2026, 12:36 p.m.