Triple

T25163191
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bun test runner E626496 entity
Predicate supportsImportStyle P8463 FINISHED
Object ESM import syntax LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ESM import syntax | Statement: [Bun test runner, supportsImportStyle, ESM import syntax]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsImportStyle
Context triple: [Bun test runner, supportsImportStyle, ESM import syntax]
  • A. supportsStyleDefinition
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, recognizing, or working with a particular style definition associated with another entity.
  • B. supportsMarkupStyle
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, rendering, or otherwise working with a specified markup style associated with another entity.
  • C. supportsImportExport
    Indicates that one entity provides functionality for importing and exporting data or resources to and from another entity.
  • D. allowsImports
    Indicates that one entity permits another entity to bring in or receive items, data, or resources from an external source.
  • E. canImportFormat chosen
    Indicates that an entity has the capability to import or read data in a specified format.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2834ec8190b0872e2ec3d76023 completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67c9fe7b48190b79b4041357edb49 completed May 2, 2026, 10:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f678cc272081909e5c70f1bc7407f0 completed May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:31 a.m.