Triple
T25161648
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos |
E626453
|
entity |
| Predicate | relaciónCon |
P84787
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Estados miembros de la OEA |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Estados miembros de la OEA | Statement: [Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, relaciónCon, Estados miembros de la OEA]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relaciónCon Context triple: [Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, relaciónCon, Estados miembros de la OEA]
-
A.
inRelationshipWith
Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
-
B.
allyRelation
Indicates a cooperative, supportive relationship in which the entities act as allies toward shared or aligned goals.
-
C.
subjectRelation
chosen
Indicates that one entity stands in a specified relational role or connection to another entity.
-
D.
laterRelationWith
Indicates that one entity stands in a temporal relationship to another such that it occurs or exists at a later time than the other.
-
E.
termRelationTo
Indicates a general relational association between one term and another, without specifying the exact nature of that relationship.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff2834ec8190b0872e2ec3d76023 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f46b8d45548190a5bdb4fba1d3ba4e |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f45cfb53f4819099bba48c5057e787 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:31 a.m.