Triple

T25160409
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Schwarzer König E626419 entity
Predicate possibleReferentType P114972 FINISHED
Object internal political rival LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: internal political rival | Statement: [Schwarzer König, possibleReferentType, internal political rival]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: possibleReferentType
Context triple: [Schwarzer König, possibleReferentType, internal political rival]
  • A. possibleTypeOfReferent chosen
    Indicates that something could be a potential or candidate type or category to which a given referent may belong, without asserting that it definitively is that type.
  • B. referenceType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of reference relationship that one entity has to another.
  • C. requiresReferent
    Indicates that one entity depends on or must reference another specific entity in order to be valid, interpretable, or complete.
  • D. hasReferentKnownFor
    Indicates that the referent (the thing being referred to) is known or notable for a particular characteristic, role, or achievement.
  • E. possibleElement
    Indicates that something can potentially be a member, component, or constituent part of another entity or set, without asserting that it actually is.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2834ec8190b0872e2ec3d76023 completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f5ffc74fa481909b4fe24a9337f9eb completed May 2, 2026, 1:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f5f7f99dc08190afcfb3bc4dfbec1d completed May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:31 a.m.