Triple

T25154878
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject COL (historical context) E626280 entity
Predicate successorTeamAbbreviation P164781 FINISHED
Object NJD NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: NJD | Statement: [COL (historical context), successorTeamAbbreviation, NJD]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: successorTeamAbbreviation
Context triple: [COL (historical context), successorTeamAbbreviation, NJD]
  • A. successorTeamFranchise
    Indicates that one team franchise is the direct successor or continuation of another team franchise, typically following relocation, renaming, or reorganization.
  • B. successorTeamInCity
    Indicates that one team is the direct replacement or continuation of another team within the same city.
  • C. successorMascotTeam
    Indicates that one mascot team directly follows and replaces another mascot team in sequence or role.
  • D. successorTeamLeague
    Indicates that one sports league is the direct successor to another for a given team’s participation or affiliation.
  • E. successorTeamLocation
    Indicates that one team location directly follows or replaces another team location in a sequence or organizational lineage.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2834ec8190b0872e2ec3d76023 completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f650fc44e48190bc0e0a935eac62a6 completed May 2, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f64cab1f648190a2a9460690d18a37 completed May 2, 2026, 7:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f650c466b881908954e43bfebae8a4 completed May 2, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:30 a.m.