Triple

T25140191
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Stonewall of the West E629780 entity
Predicate subjectReputation P160846 FINISHED
Object one of the best Confederate division commanders LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one of the best Confederate division commanders | Statement: [Stonewall of the West, subjectReputation, one of the best Confederate division commanders]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subjectReputation
Context triple: [Stonewall of the West, subjectReputation, one of the best Confederate division commanders]
  • A. scoringReputation
    Indicates that one entity evaluates and assigns a reputation-related score to another entity based on its behavior or performance.
  • B. institutionalReputationContext
    Indicates the situational or environmental factors that shape or influence an institution’s reputation.
  • C. securityReputation
    Indicates the assessed trustworthiness or risk level associated with an entity’s security posture or behavior.
  • D. denotesReputationOf
    Indicates that one entity represents, expresses, or serves as an indicator of the reputation or perceived standing of another entity.
  • E. managerReputation
    Indicates the perceived quality, trustworthiness, and effectiveness of a manager as judged by others.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff338250819096ff6c8892804389 completed April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60ac643108190ae81561267155791 completed May 2, 2026, 2:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f602ce79ec8190b8336c2b9de18ac7 completed May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f606c15af88190958856a9e467b826 completed May 2, 2026, 2:14 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:29 a.m.