Triple
T25120063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GI (Palenque triad deity) |
E629240
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSiblingDeity |
P159722
|
FINISHED |
| Object | GII (Palenque triad deity) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: GII (Palenque triad deity) | Statement: [GI (Palenque triad deity), hasSiblingDeity, GII (Palenque triad deity)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSiblingDeity Context triple: [GI (Palenque triad deity), hasSiblingDeity, GII (Palenque triad deity)]
-
A.
hasParentDeity
Indicates that one deity is the parent (progenitor or creator) of another deity.
-
B.
hasConsortDeity
Indicates that one deity is the consort (spouse or intimate divine partner) of another deity.
-
C.
hasGuardianDeity
Indicates that an entity is under the protection or patronage of a specific guardian deity.
-
D.
hasDeity
Indicates that one entity recognizes, worships, or is associated with another entity as its deity or divine figure.
-
E.
sharesDeitiesWith
Indicates that two entities have one or more deities in common within their respective religious or mythological systems.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff3288048190bd82c3b7f7bd0e62 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f5f7a205688190b8f36bff5013247c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:09 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f5afd5baac8190bb8ed576813c8591 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:03 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f5f6b32a8881909baa0db57b80d56a |
completed | May 2, 2026, 1:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:27 a.m.