Triple
T25115761
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Federal Shariat Court |
E629123
|
entity |
| Predicate | canInitiateReview |
P157659
|
FINISHED |
| Object | on petition by a citizen |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: on petition by a citizen | Statement: [Federal Shariat Court, canInitiateReview, on petition by a citizen]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canInitiateReview Context triple: [Federal Shariat Court, canInitiateReview, on petition by a citizen]
-
A.
canReview
Indicates that one entity has the permission or ability to evaluate, assess, or provide feedback on another entity.
-
B.
canBeReviewedAgainst
Indicates that one item may be evaluated, compared, or assessed in relation to another as a reference or standard.
-
C.
cannotReview
Indicates that an entity is not permitted or able to perform a review of another entity or item.
-
D.
hasReviewed
Indicates that one entity has examined, evaluated, or provided feedback on another entity (such as a work, product, or performance).
-
E.
hasReviewPeriod
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific time span during which it is subject to review or evaluation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff3169d08190973b6061d5009abd |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f465c66cc48190b66b14e4b9036432 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f442c861188190967655c6d8012380 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:06 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f448fe11f08190bdd53ca7ba2d51e4 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:27 a.m.