Triple
T25097311
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mutual Recognition Arrangement of the CIPM |
E628624
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | international arrangement |
C39686
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: international arrangement Context triple: [Mutual Recognition Arrangement of the CIPM, instanceOf, international arrangement]
-
A.
international agreement
An international agreement is a formal, negotiated arrangement between two or more sovereign states or international organizations that creates binding obligations under international law.
-
B.
international agreement implementation area
The international agreement implementation area is a defined domain—such as a sector, region, or policy field—within which the provisions of an international agreement are applied, monitored, and enforced.
-
C.
international framework
An international framework is a structured set of principles, rules, and mechanisms agreed upon by multiple countries to guide cooperation, coordination, and decision-making on shared global issues.
-
D.
international policy instrument
chosen
An international policy instrument is a formal agreement, framework, or mechanism used by multiple countries or international organizations to coordinate actions, set standards, or achieve shared policy objectives across borders.
-
E.
international initiative
An international initiative is a coordinated effort among multiple countries or global organizations aimed at addressing shared challenges or achieving common goals across national borders.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff3071548190b62d1ac237397197 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:25 a.m.