Triple

T25092556
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Foss v Harbottle E628501 entity
Predicate hasExceptionType P160096 FINISHED
Object derivative action LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: derivative action | Statement: [Foss v Harbottle, hasExceptionType, derivative action]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasExceptionType
Context triple: [Foss v Harbottle, hasExceptionType, derivative action]
  • A. hasExceptionFor
    Indicates that a general rule, condition, or behavior does not apply in a particular case or under specific circumstances.
  • B. hasException
    Indicates that a general rule, process, or condition does not apply in a particular case due to a specified exception.
  • C. hasExceptionConstruct
    Indicates that a construct or element is associated with, or defined by, a specific exception-handling construct (such as a try-catch or similar exception mechanism).
  • D. haveExceptionMember
    Indicates that an entity includes or is associated with a member that represents an exception to a rule, condition, or normal behavior.
  • E. hasErrorType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with, or classified by, a specific type or category of error.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2f58e881908340527bc5d34f07 completed April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6018f91248190985323d1a678e539 completed May 2, 2026, 1:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f5f7f99dc08190afcfb3bc4dfbec1d completed May 2, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f5ffc6268c8190b63f6360ebadab73 completed May 2, 2026, 1:44 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:24 a.m.