Triple
T25088760
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | West Virginia magistrate courts |
E628394
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDecisionAppealedTo |
P160727
|
FINISHED |
| Object | West Virginia circuit courts |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: West Virginia circuit courts | Statement: [West Virginia magistrate courts, hasDecisionAppealedTo, West Virginia circuit courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDecisionAppealedTo Context triple: [West Virginia magistrate courts, hasDecisionAppealedTo, West Virginia circuit courts]
-
A.
decidedAppealsFrom
chosen
Indicates that one judicial body reviewed and rendered decisions on appeals originating from another judicial body.
-
B.
hasFinalDecisionOn
Indicates that one entity holds the ultimate authority or responsibility to make and enforce a conclusive decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
C.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
D.
hasEnduringAppeal
Indicates that something continues to attract interest, admiration, or enjoyment over a long period of time.
-
E.
hasLowerCourtDecision
Indicates that a higher court case is associated with, or results from, a specific decision made by a lower court.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff2f58e881908340527bc5d34f07 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f657f653448190a945b4751af8507d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6575ba12081909396036f78757a76 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:24 a.m.