Triple
T25086970
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | America's Cup 1980 |
E628349
|
entity |
| Predicate | losingYacht |
P157935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Australia |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Australia | Statement: [America's Cup 1980, losingYacht, Australia]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: losingYacht Context triple: [America's Cup 1980, losingYacht, Australia]
-
A.
sailingUnder
Indicates that one entity (typically a vessel) is operating or traveling while registered, flagged, or officially recognized under the authority or jurisdiction of another entity (such as a country or organization).
-
B.
losingCaptain
Indicates that the referenced captain is the one who lost in a particular contest, game, or competitive event.
-
C.
lostToSea
Indicates that something has been carried away or disappeared into the sea, resulting in its loss.
-
D.
challengedWithYacht
Indicates that one party issued a challenge to another using a yacht as the means or context of the challenge.
-
E.
isAbandonedAtSeaBy
Indicates that one entity is deliberately left behind or deserted at sea by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff2f58e881908340527bc5d34f07 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f461e4d88c8190a81861b733d534ac |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f44d8043b081908bbffd7f044b4f26 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f45300bd488190bb1d4160f5534ef6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:23 a.m.