Triple
T25083342
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Haiti–Dominican Republic border |
E628243
|
entity |
| Predicate | colonialPowerEastSide |
P157934
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Spain |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spain | Statement: [Haiti–Dominican Republic border, colonialPowerEastSide, Spain]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: colonialPowerEastSide Context triple: [Haiti–Dominican Republic border, colonialPowerEastSide, Spain]
-
A.
colonialPowerWestSide
Indicates that a colonial power controls or exerts authority over the western side of a specified territory or region.
-
B.
colonialPowerInvolved
Indicates that a colonial power is involved in, influences, or exerts control over the referenced situation, event, or relationship.
-
C.
colonialPowerAfter
Indicates that one entity became the colonial ruler of another entity after a specified time or event, succeeding a previous colonial authority.
-
D.
colonialPowerOpposed
Indicates that one colonial power actively resisted, conflicted with, or worked against another colonial power or its interests.
-
E.
colonialPowerBefore
Indicates that one entity served as the colonial ruling power over another entity during an earlier, preceding time period.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff2e73f881909992bf3eda5c25cb |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f461e18c288190a0d06a7756fed024 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 8:18 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f44d8043b081908bbffd7f044b4f26 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f45300bd488190bb1d4160f5534ef6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 7:15 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:22 a.m.