Triple
T250800
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DSV Limiting Factor |
E5141
|
entity |
| Predicate | safetyDesign |
P1529
|
FINISHED |
| Object | redundant critical systems |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: redundant critical systems | Statement: [DSV Limiting Factor, safetyDesign, redundant critical systems]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: safetyDesign Context triple: [DSV Limiting Factor, safetyDesign, redundant critical systems]
-
A.
securityFeature
Indicates that an entity provides, embodies, or is associated with a mechanism or property intended to enhance safety, protection, or defense against threats or vulnerabilities.
-
B.
designedIn
Indicates that something was created, planned, or conceived during a particular time period or at a specific location.
-
C.
hasDesign
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses, embodies, or is characterized by a particular design associated with another entity.
-
D.
designUse
Indicates that one entity is used as a design basis, purpose, or intended functional use for another entity.
-
E.
securityMechanism
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as a means or method to protect another entity from threats, vulnerabilities, or unauthorized actions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257c4bf688190a46ebbf411ab7473 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25d38aba8819081d0958eb60ce27e |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b665f8c8190aac6fcbba2a0eebb |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.