Triple
T25069679
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Count Egmont |
E627873
|
entity |
| Predicate | governingPowerOpposed |
P103364
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Spanish Empire |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Spanish Empire | Statement: [Count Egmont, governingPowerOpposed, Spanish Empire]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governingPowerOpposed Context triple: [Count Egmont, governingPowerOpposed, Spanish Empire]
-
A.
colonialPowerOpposed
Indicates that one colonial power actively resisted, conflicted with, or worked against another colonial power or its interests.
-
B.
opposedFormOfGovernment
Indicates that one entity holds a stance against, or is in opposition to, the form of government represented by the other entity.
-
C.
opposingMonarch
Indicates that two monarchs are in opposition to each other, typically as rivals, enemies, or leaders of conflicting factions or states.
-
D.
traditionallyOpposedRuler
chosen
Indicates that one entity has historically or customarily been in opposition to the rule or authority of another entity.
-
E.
successorRegimeOpposedByTitleHolder
Indicates that the regime succeeding a previous one is opposed or resisted by the holder of a particular title.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff2d71dc8190b4758e57d643cbe4 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67257b0448190a13011af81c81449 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f66ec3d3d48190ab2f2b71939e572e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:10 a.m.