Triple

T25063523
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject rdf:Bag E627723 entity
Predicate statusInRDF11 P160841 FINISHED
Object legacy container construct LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: legacy container construct | Statement: [rdf:Bag, statusInRDF11, legacy container construct]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInRDF11
Context triple: [rdf:Bag, statusInRDF11, legacy container construct]
  • A. ontologyStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of an entity within an ontology lifecycle (e.g., proposed, active, deprecated, or obsolete).
  • B. statusInSI
    Indicates that an entity’s status or condition is specified according to the International System of Units (SI) or an SI-based standard.
  • C. standardizationStatus
    Indicates the current stage or condition of an entity in a formal standardization process (e.g., proposed, under review, approved, deprecated).
  • D. statusInLogic
    Indicates the logical status or role an entity holds within a formal reasoning or inference context.
  • E. statusIndicates
    Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2d71dc8190b4758e57d643cbe4 completed April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f60ac643108190ae81561267155791 completed May 2, 2026, 2:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f602ce79ec8190b8336c2b9de18ac7 completed May 2, 2026, 1:57 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f606c15af88190958856a9e467b826 completed May 2, 2026, 2:14 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:10 a.m.