Triple

T25063492
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ContainerMembershipProperty E627722 entity
Predicate isPartOfVocabulary P165810 FINISHED
Object RDFS core vocabulary LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: RDFS core vocabulary | Statement: [ContainerMembershipProperty, isPartOfVocabulary, RDFS core vocabulary]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isPartOfVocabulary
Context triple: [ContainerMembershipProperty, isPartOfVocabulary, RDFS core vocabulary]
  • A. hasVocabularyFrom
    Indicates that one entity’s vocabulary, terminology, or set of terms is derived from, based on, or taken from another entity.
  • B. usesControlledVocabulary
    Indicates that one entity selects terms or values from a predefined, standardized set rather than using free-form or arbitrary expressions.
  • C. hasDistinctVocabulary
    Indicates that one entity’s vocabulary is different or distinguishable from that of another entity.
  • D. isOnlyPartOf
    Indicates that an entity is a component exclusively of a specific whole and not of any other whole.
  • E. hasKnownVocabulary
    Indicates that an entity possesses a defined, identifiable set of terms or words that it can recognize or use.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2d71dc8190b4758e57d643cbe4 completed April 18, 2026, 3:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f65b14512c8190a40e70319dcc54cd completed May 2, 2026, 8:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f659cc571c819097e51e531961d812 completed May 2, 2026, 8:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65a9cb0bc8190bf8a9b319900bad5 completed May 2, 2026, 8:12 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:10 a.m.