Triple

T25048661
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mr Tompkins in Wonderland E627313 entity
Predicate laterCombinedIn P70673 FINISHED
Object Mr Tompkins in Paperback NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mr Tompkins in Paperback | Statement: [Mr Tompkins in Wonderland, laterCombinedIn, Mr Tompkins in Paperback]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterCombinedIn
Context triple: [Mr Tompkins in Wonderland, laterCombinedIn, Mr Tompkins in Paperback]
  • A. laterCombination
    Indicates that one entity is a combination or composite that occurs after, or is formed subsequent to, another entity or state.
  • B. laterComplementedBy
    Indicates that an earlier entity is subsequently supplemented, enhanced, or completed by a later entity.
  • C. combinedIn chosen
    Indicates that two or more entities are merged, joined, or used together to form a single combined whole or context.
  • D. laterExtendedIn
    Indicates that an existing entity (such as a work, version, or specification) was subsequently expanded, updated, or built upon by a later entity.
  • E. laterMergedWith
    Indicates that one entity was combined into and became part of another entity at a subsequent point in time.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2b4c80819087c916b2b16241b9 completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f62d89b89c8190afb372a8172111e7 completed May 2, 2026, 4:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f62c1379f08190836c3e02b0c892df completed May 2, 2026, 4:53 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:08 a.m.