Triple

T2504730
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lucas critique E52550 entity
Predicate inAcademicDebate P40843 FINISHED
Object macroeconomic model design LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: macroeconomic model design | Statement: [Lucas critique, inAcademicDebate, macroeconomic model design]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inAcademicDebate
Context triple: [Lucas critique, inAcademicDebate, macroeconomic model design]
  • A. hasLongTermDebateOn
    Indicates that there is an ongoing, extended period of discussion, disagreement, or argument concerning a particular topic or issue.
  • B. languageOfDebate
    Indicates that a specified language is the one used for conducting a particular debate.
  • C. debateOrganizer
    Indicates that one entity is responsible for organizing, coordinating, or managing a debate involving another entity or entities.
  • D. discourse
    Indicates that one entity engages in extended verbal or written communication or discussion with another entity.
  • E. enteredPoliticalDebateIn
    Indicates that an entity took part in a political debate that occurred in a specified place or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4957b3a88190adf968ae0c1b931c completed March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd65d6a988190aaaac8e98540a14f completed March 7, 2026, 7:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0bd996c8190ba8b9d6e4333b8d4 completed March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abd65c9d508190957285a078698ed2 completed March 7, 2026, 7:40 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:46 p.m.