Triple

T25041917
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Reclaim Australia E627135 entity
Predicate criticFocus P56725 FINISHED
Object Indigenous sovereignty LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Indigenous sovereignty | Statement: [Reclaim Australia, criticFocus, Indigenous sovereignty]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criticFocus
Context triple: [Reclaim Australia, criticFocus, Indigenous sovereignty]
  • A. criticRole
    Indicates that an entity serves in the capacity or function of a critic in relation to another entity or work.
  • B. criticObjective chosen
    Indicates that an entity serves as the target or focus of a critic’s evaluation, commentary, or judgment.
  • C. movementCritic
    Indicates a relationship where one entity critiques, evaluates, or expresses disapproval of a particular movement (such as a social, political, or artistic movement).
  • D. criticOutputs
    Indicates that a critic produces or provides an evaluative response, judgment, or commentary about a target.
  • E. movementCritiqued
    Indicates that a particular movement (e.g., social, artistic, political) is the target of criticism or negative evaluation by someone or something.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2b4c80819087c916b2b16241b9 completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f464b4c9b0819085daa00c7c3b8b76 completed May 1, 2026, 8:30 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f45cfb53f4819099bba48c5057e787 completed May 1, 2026, 7:57 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:08 a.m.