Triple

T25033284
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Brook Benton E626907 entity
Predicate songwritingForOthers P157915 FINISHED
Object wrote songs for other R&B artists in the 1950s LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: wrote songs for other R&B artists in the 1950s | Statement: [Brook Benton, songwritingForOthers, wrote songs for other R&B artists in the 1950s]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: songwritingForOthers
Context triple: [Brook Benton, songwritingForOthers, wrote songs for other R&B artists in the 1950s]
  • A. songwritingForOthers chosen
    Indicates that an entity creates songs intended to be performed or used by other entities rather than themselves.
  • B. coSongwriter
    Indicates that two or more entities collaborated in writing the same song.
  • C. songwriterCollective
    Indicates a relationship where a songwriter is a member of, or affiliated with, a collective group of songwriters.
  • D. songwritingTheme
    Indicates that one entity serves as the thematic subject or central topic of another entity’s songwriting.
  • E. writesLyricsIn
    Indicates that an entity creates or composes song lyrics in a specified language or writing system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2a2c088190be513727ee8bfe78 completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f47b865df48190bf4b6d3e9f9305e6 completed May 1, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f4682c8a3c8190adbfaac99474eaaf completed May 1, 2026, 8:45 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:07 a.m.