Triple

T25025092
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Supreme Court Act 1933 (ACT) E626688 entity
Predicate typeOfCourtEstablished P151563 FINISHED
Object superior court of record LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: superior court of record | Statement: [Supreme Court Act 1933 (ACT), typeOfCourtEstablished, superior court of record]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfCourtEstablished
Context triple: [Supreme Court Act 1933 (ACT), typeOfCourtEstablished, superior court of record]
  • A. establishedAsSeparateCourts
    Indicates that one or more courts were formally created or recognized as distinct, independent judicial bodies separate from existing courts.
  • B. originatedInCourtOf
    Indicates that a legal case, decision, or proceeding began or was first filed in a specified court.
  • C. typeOfTribunal chosen
    Indicates the specific category or kind of tribunal (e.g., court or adjudicative body) to which an entity belongs.
  • D. createdCourt
    Indicates that an entity (typically a person or organization) established or founded a particular court.
  • E. courtName
    Indicates the official name assigned to a particular court within a legal or judicial system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff28ee3881909c626af002457a4a completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f674e06c9481909ed0ea736408f0d7 completed May 2, 2026, 10:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f673c2f81c8190bf369226306eef09 completed May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:07 a.m.