Triple

T25005057
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Grayndler E625818 entity
Predicate hasVotingProfile P85910 FINISHED
Object strong progressive voting base LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strong progressive voting base | Statement: [Grayndler, hasVotingProfile, strong progressive voting base]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasVotingProfile
Context triple: [Grayndler, hasVotingProfile, strong progressive voting base]
  • A. hasElectorateProfile chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific electorate-related profile describing its voting or demographic characteristics.
  • B. hasVotingPower
    Indicates that an entity possesses the authority or capacity to participate in a decision-making or electoral process by casting votes.
  • C. votingStatus
    Indicates whether an entity is currently eligible, registered, or has participated in a voting process.
  • D. hadVoteIn
    Indicates that an entity participated by casting a vote in a particular decision, election, or voting event.
  • E. hasVotingPlatform
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or utilizes a particular platform or system for conducting voting or elections.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff26c50481908bc82e799c9e6587 completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f47b865df48190bf4b6d3e9f9305e6 completed May 1, 2026, 10:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f4682c8a3c8190adbfaac99474eaaf completed May 1, 2026, 8:45 a.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:05 a.m.