Triple
T24999193
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Little Green Bag |
E625668
|
entity |
| Predicate | reissueOrResurgence |
P9802
|
FINISHED |
| Object | early 1990s |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: early 1990s | Statement: [Little Green Bag, reissueOrResurgence, early 1990s]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reissueOrResurgence Context triple: [Little Green Bag, reissueOrResurgence, early 1990s]
-
A.
reissueFeature
Indicates that an existing item (such as a product, document, or media release) is being issued again, typically with updates, changes, or in a new edition or format.
-
B.
wasReissued
Indicates that an item, such as a document or edition, has been issued again after its original release.
-
C.
reissuedOnFormat
Indicates that an item has been reissued in a particular format or medium.
-
D.
revival
chosen
Indicates the act of bringing something back into use, popularity, or active existence after a period of decline, dormancy, or disuse.
-
E.
reissueIncludes
Indicates that a reissued version of something contains or incorporates the referenced item as part of that reissue.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff26c50481908bc82e799c9e6587 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f44b0a7024819080dde85d6b32194c |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f442c0c2e88190acd7f170f10ccef6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:04 a.m.