Triple
T24998797
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Logie Award |
E625649
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableTopHonor |
P32108
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Gold Logie for Most Popular Personality on Australian Television |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gold Logie for Most Popular Personality on Australian Television | Statement: [Logie Award, notableTopHonor, Gold Logie for Most Popular Personality on Australian Television]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableTopHonor Context triple: [Logie Award, notableTopHonor, Gold Logie for Most Popular Personality on Australian Television]
-
A.
notableAwardOrHonor
Indicates that an entity has received a specific notable award or honor.
-
B.
notableAwardRecognition
Indicates that an entity has received or been formally recognized with a notable award or honor.
-
C.
notableAwardWon
chosen
Indicates that an entity has received a specific notable award as a winner.
-
D.
notableAwardedFor
Indicates that an award is notable specifically for being given in recognition of a particular work, achievement, or contribution.
-
E.
hasNotableHonor
Indicates that an entity has received a significant award, title, or formal recognition of distinction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff26c50481908bc82e799c9e6587 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f707f7959881908f037f0d6b1d0c36 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f700fc274c8190a128593dc7c7abd0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:04 a.m.