Triple

T24989828
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject T-10 E625414 entity
Predicate sharesStationWithOtherLines P61736 FINISHED
Object Yes (Ginza Line, Asakusa Line at Nihonbashi) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yes (Ginza Line, Asakusa Line at Nihonbashi) | Statement: [T-10, sharesStationWithOtherLines, Yes (Ginza Line, Asakusa Line at Nihonbashi)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesStationWithOtherLines
Context triple: [T-10, sharesStationWithOtherLines, Yes (Ginza Line, Asakusa Line at Nihonbashi)]
  • A. sharesStationsWith chosen
    Indicates that two transit routes or lines have one or more stations or stops in common along their paths.
  • B. sharesTrunkLineWith
    Indicates that two entities are connected to or use the same primary communication or utility trunk line.
  • C. sharesLineUpWith
    Indicates that two entities participate together in the same lineup or roster at the same time.
  • D. stationSharing
    Indicates a relationship where multiple services, lines, or operators use or serve the same station location.
  • E. sharesTracksWith
    Indicates that two entities have one or more tracks in common, such as shared audio, rail, or route segments.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff2611c081908710457fbe6d376b completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f621fcea1481909b6f8b3af1ee6820 completed May 2, 2026, 4:10 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f620dc38088190b56b2b15ed75b3c2 completed May 2, 2026, 4:05 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:03 a.m.