Triple
T24980834
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bellerus |
E625161
|
entity |
| Predicate | certaintyOfHistoricExistence |
P33842
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mythical or legendary |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mythical or legendary | Statement: [Bellerus, certaintyOfHistoricExistence, mythical or legendary]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: certaintyOfHistoricExistence Context triple: [Bellerus, certaintyOfHistoricExistence, mythical or legendary]
-
A.
historicalExistence
Indicates that an entity actually existed at some point in real-world history, as opposed to being fictional, hypothetical, or mythological.
-
B.
hasUncertainHistoricBasis
chosen
Indicates that the historical foundation or authenticity of the related fact, event, or relationship is doubtful, disputed, or not firmly established.
-
C.
hasHistoricSignificanceFor
Indicates that something holds notable historical importance or relevance for a particular entity or group.
-
D.
chronologyCertainty
Indicates the degree of confidence or uncertainty about the ordering or dating of events or temporal relationships.
-
E.
historicalEvidence
Indicates that there exists documented or otherwise verifiable information supporting the occurrence, authenticity, or truth of a past event, state, or relationship between entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff254570819093d197b1900305ac |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f4490636f88190b8e614202f6d7a65 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f442c0c2e88190acd7f170f10ccef6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:02 a.m.