Triple

T2497935
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject ESV Thinline Bible E52394 entity
Predicate readingFeature P40143 FINISHED
Object Readable type size for thin format LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Readable type size for thin format | Statement: [ESV Thinline Bible, readingFeature, Readable type size for thin format]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: readingFeature
Context triple: [ESV Thinline Bible, readingFeature, Readable type size for thin format]
  • A. readingAid
    Indicates that one entity assists or facilitates another entity’s ability to read or engage in reading activities.
  • B. readingTechnology
    Indicates a relationship where a reading activity involves or is carried out using a particular technology.
  • C. containsReading
    Indicates that one entity includes or encompasses a particular reading (such as a measurement, value, or interpretation) within it.
  • D. readingApproach
    Indicates the method, strategy, or manner in which an entity engages in reading a text.
  • E. readingExperience
    Indicates the relationship in which an entity engages with written or visual material, capturing the act, manner, or quality of that reading activity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4957b3a88190adf968ae0c1b931c completed March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd1ad2f8c81908853e97d75081e84 completed March 7, 2026, 7:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abd0bba5348190bb4637d3165cb339 completed March 7, 2026, 7:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abd1aa13a08190a8757c017d8a2478 completed March 7, 2026, 7:20 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:46 p.m.