Triple

T24978540
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject San Francisco Supervisorial District 2 E625094 entity
Predicate hasLocalIssues P160831 FINISHED
Object public safety LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: public safety | Statement: [San Francisco Supervisorial District 2, hasLocalIssues, public safety]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLocalIssues
Context triple: [San Francisco Supervisorial District 2, hasLocalIssues, public safety]
  • A. hasLocalIssues chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or affected by specific issues or problems occurring within a particular local area or community.
  • B. hasIssueWith
    Indicates that one entity experiences a problem, conflict, or concern related to another entity.
  • C. hasOngoingIssues
    Indicates that an entity is currently experiencing unresolved or continuing problems or difficulties.
  • D. hasRecentIssue
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an issue or problem that has occurred within a recent or specified time frame.
  • E. hasInternalIssue
    Indicates that an entity is experiencing a problem, fault, or malfunction originating within itself or its internal components or processes.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2ff254570819093d197b1900305ac completed April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f61f12b0f08190bc4a16907941864c completed May 2, 2026, 3:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f61b37a5648190b10d33ae205ccfee completed May 2, 2026, 3:41 p.m.
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6:02 a.m.