Triple
T24966718
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Southern Melanesian languages |
E624766
|
entity |
| Predicate | typologicallyBelongTo |
P143418
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Austronesian language type |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Austronesian language type | Statement: [Southern Melanesian languages, typologicallyBelongTo, Austronesian language type]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typologicallyBelongTo Context triple: [Southern Melanesian languages, typologicallyBelongTo, Austronesian language type]
-
A.
typologicalGroup
chosen
Indicates that entities are classified together based on shared structural or typological characteristics.
-
B.
believedToBelongTo
Indicates that something is thought or assumed, but not definitively known, to be owned by or part of a particular entity.
-
C.
canBelongTo
Indicates that something is capable of being a member or part of a particular group, category, or owner.
-
D.
hasTypologicalRelation
Indicates a relationship where two linguistic entities are connected based on shared structural or typological features, such as word order, morphology, or phonological patterns.
-
E.
proposedToBelongTo
Indicates that one entity has been suggested or put forward as potentially belonging to, or being a member/part of, another entity or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2ff24512481908e9a72315b8d0354 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 3:48 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f4490283c481908c18246dc7125eec |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f442c0c2e88190acd7f170f10ccef6 |
completed | May 1, 2026, 6:05 a.m. |
Created at: April 18, 2026, 6 a.m.